The Chronicle Of A Complex Project
Updated: 20 hours ago
When Securing Capital Required More Than Just Funding
A major project can be attractive on paper and still face a fundamental obstacle: The acquisition, the financing and the requirements of the parties involved must all move forward together.
This was the challenge behind a proposed EUR 500 million development involving the acquisition of a property in a prime location and its transformation into an exclusive luxury resort and residential destination.
The project illustrates an important reality of major project financing. Securing capital is not always simply a matter of finding a funder. Sometimes, the real challenge is structuring the transaction so that the project, the acquisition and the financing can progress together.
For PBO-OBS Global Group, this meant working closely with the prospective buyer, coordinating the requirements of the financing process with the acquisition negotiations, and helping bring the different elements of the transaction into alignment.
Part One – The Project And The First Challenge
A Rare Development Opportunity in an Exceptional Location
The proposed development involved the acquisition of a well-known costal location and its transformation into a high-end hospitality and residential destination.
The development comprised:
Acquisition of the land.
Infrastructure development.
A five-star luxury hotel with 60 suites.
Private access – including a marina and a heliport.
80-100 luxury villas.
80-100 luxury bungalows.
The estimated investment was approximately EUR 500 million – it included the land acquisition, infrastructure, the hotel and resort development.
The projected value of the completed development was estimated at approximately EUR 1.5–2.3 billion.
The land was privately owned, offered below market value and supported by a comprehensive business plan and the necessary construction permits and licences. No comparable site at this attractive location in the region was available under similar lucrative conditions.
On paper, the opportunity was compelling. The development appeared ready to proceed, subject to the necessary transaction, financing and implementation requirements.
But before construction could begin, the first challenge had to be resolved.
The Acquisition Had To Move Before The Financing Could Progress
The prospective buyer needed to negotiate an acquisition agreement that the land owners would guarantee not to sell the land during a defined due diligence period before completion of the purchase.
During that period, the prospective buyer needed sufficient time to verify the opportunity, satisfy the relevant requirements and secure the financing necessary to proceed.
However, the seller also needed credible assurance that the prospective buyer had both the financial capability and the intention to complete the transaction.
A Term Sheet from the funder was therefore required to support the acquisition negotiations.
This created an unusual situation.
The funder was being asked to issue a Term Sheet before the prospective buyer had taken ownership of the land - and even before a formal acquisition agreement had been secured. At that stage, only a verbal intention to proceed was in place.
The sequence was effectively reversed.
The prospective buyer needed funding assurance to advance the acquisition. The funder needed sufficient certainty about the transaction to assess the financing. And the seller needed confidence that the prospective buyer could complete the purchase.
The challenge was not simply to establish whether the project could be financed. It was to bring the acquisition and financing processes together in a structure that gave each party sufficient confidence to move forward.
That distinction would shape the entire transaction.
Part Two – Aligning The Transaction
Trust Was Important. Structure Was Essential.
The existing owners were prepared to sell the land but would not participate in its subsequent development. The project would therefore be undertaken by the new prospective buyer and developer.
Importantly, the prospective buyer was already known to and trusted by PBO-OBS Global Group. This established relationship provided an additional level of confidence in the prospective buyer's credibility, intentions and ability to undertake the proposed development.
However, trust alone could not resolve the transaction's structural challenges.
PBO-OBS's Role: Keeping The Acquisition And Financing Aligned
PBO-OBS worked closely with and advised the prospective buyer throughout the negotiation process.
Both the prospective buyer and the seller had their own legal advisers, and the acquisition negotiations remained between these respective parties.
Our responsibility was to support the prospective buyer while keeping the requirements of the financing process aligned with the realities of the acquisition.
This required an understanding of what the prospective buyer needed to secure the transaction, what the seller needed to proceed with confidence and what the funder required before advancing the financing process.
PBO-OBS remained closely involved throughout the negotiations, advising the prospective buyer, coordinating communication with the seller's side and keeping the financing requirements central to the process.
This is an important distinction in complex project financing.
Access to a source of capital is only one element. Understanding the funder's requirements and helping the prospective buyer prepare a transaction that addresses those requirements can be equally important.
Securing The Term Sheet
Given this background, PBO-OBS successfully secured the Term Sheet from the funder.
This was a significant step because it provided the prospective buyer with the funding assurance required to support the acquisition process and helped the parties move towards the next stage.
However, a Term Sheet is not the same as completed financing. It establishes a basis for further consideration, subject to the applicable conditions, due diligence and definitive agreements.
The transaction therefore entered a more demanding phase.
The opportunity now had to withstand detailed examination - not only as a development proposal, but as an entire financing transaction.
Part Three – Due Diligence: Where The Real Test Begins
A compelling project and a Term Sheet can create momentum. However, neither eliminates the need to verify the transaction in detail.
For this development, due diligence extended beyond the land acquisition, the business plan and the projected financial returns. It also involved the people, ownership arrangements and corporate structures required to execute the transaction.
The Sellers Had To Be Verified
The company that owned the land had four shareholding partners. The company and each seller had to be properly verified.
It was necessary to establish that none was subject to bank restrictions or other circumstances that could prevent or complicate the property transfer or completion of the transaction.
This was an essential part of the process.
Even where the asset is attractive and the prospective buyer is prepared, issues affecting one of the sellers could have delayed or jeopardised the entire transaction.
The ownership and transfer requirements therefore had to be examined alongside the wider project due diligence.
The Buyer Had To Be Prepared To Receive The Capital
The prospective buyer also needed to establish an appropriate corporate structure capable of receiving the substantial funding tranches required for the transaction.
The corporate framework had to be suitable for the proposed financing arrangement and capable of supporting the receipt and application of significant amounts of capital in accordance with the agreed transaction structure.
The prospective buyer therefore needed to put the appropriate structure in place before the funding could be deployed.
This illustrates an important principle of major project financing: a project owner must be prepared not only to seek capital, but also to receive and deploy it within an appropriate transaction framework.
Due Diligence Must Extend Across The Entire Transaction
For a development of this scale, the examination had to consider all the interconnected elements of the proposed transaction, including:
The acquisition terms and ownership structure.
The sellers and all the legal requirements for transferring the property.
The prospective buyer and corporate framework.
The development rights and construction permits and licences.
The business plan and proposed development.
The projected costs, revenues and financial assumptions.
The proposed financing structure and funding requirements.
Each element had to be assessed in the context of the others.
Due diligence is not simply about verifying the project. It is about establishing whether the entire transaction can work as proposed.
This is where the difference between an attractive opportunity and a financeable transaction becomes clear.
The challenge was to ensure that the acquisition, development plan, corporate framework and financing requirements continued to support one another as the process progressed.
The work had moved beyond securing a Term Sheet. It had become a process of testing, validating and aligning the entire transaction.
Part Four – When Figures Meet Reality
As already stated, for this development, the estimated investment was approximately EUR 500 million, leading to a projected completed value of EUR 1.5–2.3 billion.
To ensure the projected revenues, it is important to examine the practical realities of acquiring the land, developing the infrastructure, constructing the resort, financing the development and ultimately operating the completed destination.
Every major assumption mattered.
The acquisition cost had to be justified. Infrastructure requirements and construction costs had to be understood. The development programme had to be credible. The budget and financial model had to withstand scrutiny. And the projected end value had to be supported by a coherent business case.
The relationship between the investment cost and the projected end value was therefore only part of the assessment. The timing of expenditure, financing costs, execution risks, projected revenues and the assumptions underpinning the completed valuation also mattered.
A project of this scale cannot be assessed on headline figures alone.
From An Attractive Opportunity To A Coherent Transaction
The acquisition, corporate structure, development plan, financial model and funding arrangements had to be considered together.
The question was not simply whether EUR 500 million could be sourced.
It was whether the transaction could be structured in a way that addressed the acquisition requirements, satisfied the applicable due diligence, supported the proposed development and provided a credible basis for the financing.
That is where PBO-OBS's role extended beyond introducing a source of capital.
Our contribution lies in understanding how the different elements need to fit together, advising a project owner and helping keep the acquisition and financing requirements aligned as the transaction progresses.
For project owners seeking substantial capital, this distinction matters.
A strong project is a starting point. A credible project owner is important. A promising financial model is necessary. However, none of these elements can be considered in isolation when the transaction depends on all of them working together.
The Broader Lesson
Complex project financing is about the relationship between the asset, the project owner, the acquisition structure, the due diligence, the financial model and the funder's requirements.
When these elements are approached separately, even a compelling opportunity can encounter obstacles. Most are avoidable when they are considered together from the outset, as the project owner is better positioned to identify requirements early, by addressing structural weaknesses and preparing a transaction for serious financing consideration.
Comments